IDFC Premier Equity Plan A:An outstanding outperformer
03/05/2010
There’s no arguing with the numbers. In its history, IDFC Premier Equity Plan A has underperformed the category average in just two quarters (out of 14).
In 2007, it trounced the competition with a return of 110 per cent (category average: 64%). In the bear phase running from January 8, 2008 to March 9, 2009, it shed 54 per cent (category average: -64%). Its 3-year trailing returns of 30.45 per cent (July 31, 2009) places it streets ahead of the competition.
Hats off to fund manager Kenneth Andrade who boldly rides his bets. Little wonder that allocation to Services touched 44.74 per cent (May 2007) or FMCG accounted for 21.66 per cent (March 2009). Neither does he shirk from taking contrarian stands; his bias towards Services ever since inception and his restraint from going heavy on Energy, despite the sector gaining impressively, are cases in point.
In 2007 he did not jump into Metals. Ironically, the BSE Metal index delivered 121.47 per cent that year and yet the fund returned 46 per cent higher than the category average.
But Andrade is unsure if he should be branded a contrarian. “This fund attempts to capture shifts in the business environment with regard to new business opportunities, technologies and trends. We try to position ourselves ahead of the chain. It may or may not pay off but we must have sufficient reason to believe in what we are investing in,” he says.
With a focus on small companies, Andrade has an interest in keeping the fund size small. Hence it was shut for fresh investments during periods in 2006 and 2007. He maintains a tight portfolio spread across 26 stocks (1 year average) whose allocations don’t cross 7 per cent, barring Shree Renuka Sugars.
Ever since Andrade took over the fund in February 2007, he has maintained a high debt allocation which peaked at 25.53 per cent (June 2008) while cash holding was at 12.24 per cent (May 2008). Due to these high allocations he missed out on the latest rally to some extent with a return of 91 per cent, as against the category average of 104 per cent (March 9 – July 31, 2009). “The companies in this segment are not very liquid. We don’t want to be caught on the wrong foot, so have to ensure ample liquidity for redemptions, so that we do not disturb the entire portfolio,” he says. In a nutshell, a compelling pick.

